1-1156-Needlestick

Risk Factors Associated with Needlestick Injuries among Health Care Workers in Menoufia Governorate, Egypt

Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt

Correspondence to
Aziza Saad El-Badry, MD, 25 Yasin Abdelghafar St, Shibin Elkom City, Menoufia, Egypt

Tel: +20-100-623-7186

E-mail: m_rezk9207@yahoo.com

Received: Sep 17, 2017

Accepted: Jan 13, 2018

Abstract

Background: Health care workers are at high risk of job-related blood-borne diseases due to needlestick injuries (NSIs).

Objective: To assess the risk factors associated with NSIs among health care workers in Menoufia governorate, Egypt.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 2260 health care workers of 4 randomly chosen hospitals in Menoufia governorate. Using a predesigned data collection sheet, all staff members were asked about the occurrence of NSIs in the previous 3 months. The response rate was 95.3%. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the factors associated with NSIs.

Results: The risk of NSIs significantly increased with duration of work <15 years (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.81 to 2.66), being female (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.29), working as a para-medic (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.25), working in surgical ward (OR 4.11, 95% CI 1.71 to 9.88), having more than 2 night shifts/month (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.39), absence of educational sessions (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.73), absence of hospital policies for NSIs (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.99 to 2.49), absence of universal precautions (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.50), recapping the needle after use (OR 2.63, 95% CI 2.12 to 3.26), recapping the needle with two hands (OR 3.08, 95% CI 2.04 to 4.65), not using protective clothes (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.85), and increased working hours—8–12 hours (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.44) and >12 hours (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.44).

Conclusion: The risk of NSIs is still high among health care workers that underlines the importance of comprehensive educational sessions to decrease the risk of job-related blood-borne diseases.

Keywords: Needlestick injuries; Occupational exposure; Health personnel; Personal protective equipment; Blood-borne pathogens

Introduction

Thousands of health care workers are vulnerable to contracting blood-borne viral infections such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV each year.1 The main cause of acquisition of such infections is job-related injuries due to injuries with needlestick and sharp objects (NSIs) contaminated with blood and body fluids of infected patients.2-5

Previous reviews of relevant studies have demonstrated that NSIs were associated with three major concerns: engineering factors including the form of sharp objects and protective devices, organizational factors including the existence of supplies and policies for reporting injuries and behavioral factors related to health care workers like recapping and disposal-related issues.6,7 The objective of this study was to assess the risk factors associated with NSIs among health care workers in Menoufia governorate, Egypt.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted between the beginning of May 2016 and the end of August 2017. The Medical Ethics Committee at the Menoufia Faculty of Medicine approved the study protocol before starting the study.

The approved study protocol was distributed to four tertiary level hospitals within Menoufia governorate with thorough explanations of the study objectives through personal interviews with the chiefs of the corresponding hospitals.

A total of 2260 health care workers were chosen randomly from the four hospitals—Menoufia University Hospital, Quesina Central Hospital, Menouf Central Hospital, and Shibin el-Kom Teaching Hospital. A multi-stage random sampling method was used. Three districts were chosen at random. Two hospitals in Shebin el-Kom district, the district hospital from Menouf, and the district hospital from Quesina were chosen for the study. From each hospital selected, four departments were chosen at random (General Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Internal Medicine, and Pediatrics) by simple random sampling. All staff members in the studied departments were asked to participate in this study.

Using a predesigned data collection sheet, all participants were asked about some demographic characteristics (age, sex, occupation), occurrence of NSIs during previous three months, risk factors of NSIs, and existence of hospital training programs on and policies for NSIs.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS® ver 22 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). χ2 or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate, was used to examine the categorical variables. Student's t test was used to comparison means between two groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the factors associated with NSIs. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Number of NSIs (<3 times and ≥3 times) was a dichotomous dependent variable. The independent variables included duration of work, sex, occupation, ward, number of night shifts/month, recapping needle, method of recapping, use of protective clothes, working hours, and existence of educational sessions, hospital polices, and universal precaution.

Results

Of 2260 health care workers studied, 2156 data sheets were returned, translating to a response rate of 95.3%. The rate of NSIs was 83.3%. Almost a quarter of studied participants experienced <3 times/month NSIs (Fig 1). The mean age of those with <3 times (n=1071) was 36.0 (SD 11.6) years, not significantly (p=0.26) different from that of those with ≥3 times NSIs (35.4, SD 10.8). Based on univariate analysis, risk factors of NSIs included duration of working <15 years, being female, working as a para-medic, working in surgical ward, number of night shifts >2, absence of educational program sessions on prevention of NSIs, absence of firm hospital policies for NSIs and universal measures, recapping needles with two hand, not wearing gloves, and working >8 hours per month (Table 1). Based on binary logistic regression analysis, independent risk factors for NSIs were duration of working <15 years, being female, working as a para-medic, working in surgical ward, having more than two night shifts per month, absence of educational programs, absence of hospital policies on NSIs, absence of universal precautions, recapping needle after use, recapping needle with two hands, not using protective clothes, and increased working hours (Table 1). The model explained 70.4% of the variance and correctly classified 80.1% of cases.

1-1156-Needlestick%20Fig%201.jpg

Figure 1: Frequency of NSIs/month among participants

Table 1: Results of univariate and binary logistic regression analyses of the studied risk factors for needlestick injuries among hospital health care workers

Risk factors

Number of needlestick injuries

Crude OR (95% CI)

Adj OR (95% CI)

<3 times (n=1071)

≥3 times (n=1085)

Duration of working

<15 year

423 (39.5%)

611 (56.3%)

1.97 (1.66 to 2.34)

2.19 (1.81 to 2.66)

>15 year

648 (60.5%)

474 (43.5%)

1

1

Sex

Male

534 (49.9%)

467 (43.0%)

1

1

Female

537 (50.1%)

618 (57.0%)

1.32 (1.11 to 1.56)

1.89 (1.56 to 2.29)

Occupation

Medical

691 (64.5%)

504 (46.5%)

1

1

Para-medical

380 (35.5%)

581 (53.5%)

2.10 (1.76 to 2.49)

1.49 (1.03 to 2.15)

Ward

Medical

674 (62.9%)

333 (30.7%)

1

1

Surgical

397 (37.1%)

752 (69.3%)

3.83 (3.21 to 4.59)

4.11 (1.71 to 9.88)

Number of night
shifts/month

≤2

543 (50.7%)

464 (42.8%)

1

1

>2

528 (49.3%)

621 (57.2%)

1.38 (1.16 to 1.63)

1.75 (1.28 to 2.39)

Educational sessions

Present

616 (57.5%)

455 (41.9%)

1

1

Absent

455 (42.5%)

630 (58.1%)

1.87 (1.58 to 2.22)

1.99 (1.45 to 2.73)

Hospital policies

Present

562 (52.5%)

507 (46.7%)

1

1

Absent

509 (47.5%)

578 (53.3%)

1.26 (1.06 to 1.49)

2.23 (1.99 to 2.49)

Universal precautions

Present

573 (53.5%)

525 (48.4%)

1

1

Absent

498 (46.5%)

560 (51.6%)

1.23 (1.04 to 1.45)

1.66 (1.10 to 2.50)

Recapping the needle

Yes

384 (35.9%)

667 (61.5%)

2.85 (2.40 to 3.40)

2.63 (2.12 to 3.26)

No

687 (64.1%)

418 (38.5%)

1

1

Method of recapping

n=384

n=667

One hand

214 (55.7%)

274 (41.1%)

1

1

Two hands

170 (44.3%)

393 (58.9%)

1.81 (1.40 to 2.33)

3.08 (2.04 to 4.65)

Protective clothes

Yes

560 (52.3%)

497 (45.8%)

1

1

No

511 (47.7%)

588 (54.2%)

1.30 (1.09 to 1.54)

1.39 (1.04 to 1.85)

Working hours

≤8

430 (40.1%)

246 (22.7%)

1

1

>8–12

398 (37.2%)

482 (44.4%)

2.12 (1.72 to 2.60)

2.14 (1.34 to 3.44)

>12

243 (22.7%)

357 (32.9%)

2.57 (2.05 to 3.22)

2.28 (1.17 to 4.44)

Discussion

The rate of NSIs found in this study was much higher than previous reported values of 25%–58%.4,8-12 However, in a previous study conducted in a tertiary hospital in India, about 80% of health care workers reported they had one or more NSIs during their career.13 This high rate observed could be attributed to the nature of hospitals studied, being tertiary health care centers with availability of post-exposure measures and facilities to prevent transmission of blood-borne viral infections.

In our study, less experienced health care workers were at higher risk of NSIs, which was in parallel with previous studies,4,14-16 but refuted by a recent case-control study.12 Being a female nurse was associated with a higher rate of injury, which is consistent with previous studies.2,12,17 Nurses are responsible for injections and intravenous fluid administration, which could explain why they were at a higher risk of NSIs.

Recapping needles after use and the reluctance to wear protective gloves were independent risk factors for NSIs. Most published studies have recommended that training should be given in wearing gloves for every procedure in addition to using other protective equipment when dealing with patients to prevent occupational exposure to NSIs.18-20

Shortage of educational program sessions and hospital policies was also found as a risk factor for NSIs in the current study. Although education reduces the rate of NSIs, it has been proved to be not as effective as provision of safety devices.6,10,19,20

Increased working hours, night shifts and negligence of universal precautions were also independent risk factors for NSIs in our study. Governmental hospitals are always overloaded, especially in certain wards like emergency and labor rooms. Therefore, health care workers are more likely to neglect and not to observe universal preventive measures.5,19

The large sample size with the high response rate constitutes the main strength of the current study. Self-reported data collection over the past three months may be a limitation of the study as it might introduce recall bias. Not including the private sector in our study could be another limitation of this study.

In conclusion, the risk of exposure to NSIs is still high among health care workers. This underlines the importance of more comprehensive educational sessions in order to decrease the risk of acquisition of job-related blood-borne diseases. Future research should focus on the type of educational training considering the perceived benefits and threats while developing plans to decrease NSIs among health care workers as recommended by a recent systematic review.21

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the responders for their time.

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

1.Sepkowitz KA. Occupationally acquired infections in health care workers. An Intern Med 1996;125:917-28.

2.Jovic-Vranes A, Jankovic S, Vranes B. Safety practice and professional exposure to blood and body containing materials in Serbian healthcare workers. J Occup Health 2006;48:377-82.

3.Vaz K, McGrowder D, Alexander-Lindo R, et al. Knowledge, awareness and compliance with universal precautions among health care workers at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica. Int J Occup Environ Med 2010;1:171-81.

4.Honda M, Chompikul J, Rattanapan C, et al. Sharps injuries among nurses in a Thai regional hospital: prevalence and risk factors. Int J Occup Environ Med 2011;2:215-23.

5.Gourni P, Polikandrioti M, Vasilopoulos G, et al. Occupational Exposure to blood and body fluids of nurses at Emergency department. Health Sci J 2012;6:60-8.

6.Wilburn SQ, Eijkemans G. Preventing needlestick injuries among healthcare workers: A WHO-ICN collabouration. Int J Occup Env Heal 2004;10:451-6.

7.Tadesse M, Tadesse T. Epidemiology of needlestick injuries among health-care workers in Awassa City, Southern Ethiopia. Trop Doct 2010;40:111-13.

8.Jacob A, Newson-Smith M, Murphy E, et al. Sharps injuries among health care workers in the United Arab Emirates. Occup Med (Lond) 2010;60:395-7.

9.Reda AA, Fisseha S, Mengistie B, et al. Standard precautions: occupational exposure and behavior of health care workers in Ethiopia. PLoS One 2010;5:e14420.

10.Rampal L, Zakaria R, Sook LW, et al. Needle stick and sharps injuries and factors associated among health care workers in a Malaysian hospital. Eur J Soc Sci 2010;13:354-62.

11.Amira CO, Awobusuyi JO. Needle-stick injury among health care workers in hemodialysis units in Nigeria: a multi-center study. Int J Occup Environ Med 2014;5:1-8.

12.Alemayehu T, Worku A, Assefa N. Sharp Injury and Exposure to Blood and Body Fluids among Health Care Workers in Health Care Centers of Eastern Ethiopia. Int J Occup Environ Med 2016;7:172-80.

13.Rahul Sharma, SK Rasania, Anita Verma, Saudan Singh. Study of Prevalence and Response to Needle Stick Injuries among Health Care Workers in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Delhi, India. Indian J Community Med 2010;35:74-7.

14.Alamgir H, Cvitkovich Y, Astrakianakis G, et al. Needlestick and other potential blood and body fluid exposures among health care workers in British Columbia, Canada. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:12-21.

15.Quinn MM, Markkanen PK, Galligan CJ, et al. Sharps injuries and other blood and body fluid exposures among home health care nurses and aides. Am J Public Health 2009;99:S710-7.

16.Zhang M, Wang H, Miao J, et al. Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among healthcare workers in a general hospital, China. Am J Ind Med 2009;52:89-98.

17.Jagger J, Berguer R, Phillips EK, et al. Increase in sharps injuries in surgical settings versus nonsurgical settings after passage of National Needlestick Legislation. J Am Coll Surg 2010;4:496-502.

18.Gatley M, Worsley M. Preventing needlestick injuries. BMJ 1991;302:1147.

19.Habib H, Ahmed Khan E, Aziz A. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Needle Stick Injuries among Registered Nurses in Public Sector Tertiary Care Hospitals of Pakistan. International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine & Public Health 2011;3:124-30.

20.Yenesew MA, Fekadu GA. Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among health care professionals in Bahir dar town, northwest Ethiopia. Saf Health Work 2014;5:17-22.

21.Motaarefi H, Mahmoudi H, Mohammadi E, et al. Factors Associated with Needlestick Injuries in Health Care Occupations: A Systematic Review. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:IE01-IE04.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

Exposure to needlestick injuries (NSIs) among health care workers is still high.

Independent risk factors for NSIs are age, sex, job title, working hours, place, and type of practice.

Provision of sufficient staff and safety equipment, and implementation of institutional educational programs are mandatory to reduce the rate of NSIs.

Cite this article as: Gabr HM, El-Badry AS, Younis FE. Risk factors associated with needlestick injuries among health care workers in Menoufia governorate, Egypt . Int J Occup Environ Med 2018;9:63-68. doi:10.15171/ijoem.2018.1156




 pISSN: 2008-6520
 eISSN: 2008-6814

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License