Moussavi1.html

Temporary and Permanent Level Shifts in Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions following Noise Exposure in an Animal Model

SA Moussavi-Najarkola, A Khavanin, R Mirzaei, M Salehnia, A Muhammadnejad, M Akbari

 

Abstract

Background: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is one of the most common occupational illnesses. Most of the studies on NIHL were conducted at high noise levels that people are rarely exposed to but in industries. The function of the outer hair cells (OHCs) is impaired after exposure to industrial noise. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are useful in examination of noise-induced level shifts.

Objectives: To assess the function of OHCs by DPOAE temporary and permanent level shifts (TLSdp and PLSdp) in rabbits exposed to white noise at realistic levels typically found in industrial settings over a broad range of frequencies.

Methods: 12 albino rabbits were divided into two groups: the experimental group rabbits which were exposed to 95 dB SPL white noise at 500–8000 Hz for 8 hrs/day for 5 consecutive days, and the control group rabbits with no exposure to noise. The function of OHCs was examined by DPOAE level (Ldp) in different occasions. The study groups were compared for DPOAE temporary and permanent level shifts (TLSdp and PLSdp) to assess the effect of noise on OHCs function.

Results: Noise-induced DPOAE levels (Ldp) were decreased up to 20.65 dB (on day 8) and 18.93 dB (on day 11) at 5888.50 Hz (p=0.081). TLSdp and PLSdp were significantly decreased up to 17.99 dB and 16.27 dB, respectively in the experimental group. The most and least Ldp were significantly different (p<0.05); they occurred at 5888.50 and 588.00 Hz, respectively. There were significant differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift at various frequencies (p<0.05). These differences were mainly related to 5888.50 Hz compared to other frequencies in each ear (p<0.05).

Conclusion: DPOAEs are an attractive tool for obtaining information about small temporary or permanent threshold shifts, even when the pure tone audiogram is normal.

Keywords: Hearing loss, noise-induced; Hair cell, auditory, outer; Otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous; Auditory threshold; Auditory fatigue

 

Introduction

Noise is the most pervasive physical agent in many industries. Prolonged exposure to loud noise is one of the most common causes of sensory-neural hearing loss and hearing threshold level values (TLVs).1 Sensory-neural hearing loss results from deterioration of the structures within the cochlea; usually owing to the loss of hair cells from the organ of Corti.1 Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL)—a type of sensory-neural hearing loss—is among the 10 most common occupational diseases.1

Exposures to noise in life, environment and industries are mostly in the form of exposure to the white noise.2 Exposure to excessive noise has many deleterious health effects including interference with communication, altered performance, annoyance and distraction; it may also cause interference with work or relaxation and physiological responses such as elevated blood pressure and sleep disturbances.3

Excessive noise can cause temporary or permanent damage to the auditory system.4 Repeated or prolonged exposure to intense noise gradually damages the cochlear hair cells of the inner ear, resulting in a permanent threshold shift (PTS) across multiple frequencies.5-7 Noise over-stimulation can cause damage to the cochlea, hair cell membranes, and changes in the size and shape of the hair cells via different mechanisms.7,8

Many studies reported the effects of noise on the function of the outer hair cells (OHCs), but most of them were conducted at high noise levels that people are rarely exposed to but in industries. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are used for the assessment of the OHCs activity;8 therefore, it may be used for assessing the effects of exposure to excessive noise on the OHCs function as a proxy for hearing level.

DPOAEs are sounds measured in the ear canal that reflect mechanical activity of the OHCs.9 DPOAEs can be used to screen animal hearing by providing an objective means for confirming healthy cochlear function.10 DPOAEs are generated in response to simultaneous stimulation of the cochlea by two pure tones with frequencies f1 and f2, where f2 is slightly higher than f1.11 The amplitude of the tone with the higher frequency is equal or lesser than the other one. DPOAEs are most likely generated from at least two locations on the basilar membrane—the overlapping region between f1 and f2, nearer to the f2 place; and the cubic distortion place (2f1–f2).12 DPOAE information is commonly presented as distortion product-grams (DP-grams) that depict DPOAE levels (Ldp) as a function of f2 for a selected combination of primary tone levels L1 and L2.13

The objective of the present study was to assess the function of the OHCs by DPOAE temporary and permanent level shifts (TLSdp and PLSdp) in rabbits exposed to white noise at realistic levels typically found in industrial settings over a broad range of frequencies.

 

Materials and Methods

Twelve male albino rabbits with a mean±SD body weight of 2000±200 g were maintained in animal house at 20–22 °C, 30%–70% relative humidity, and 10 times per hour air displacement. Rabbits were had access to food and soft drink water ad libitum. Animals were treated according to the general principles of Helsinki law related to laboratory animals. The minimum sample size for each group was calculated to be six according to a pilot study.

The rabbits in the experimental group were exposed to 95 dBA SPL continuous noise at 500–8000 Hz for eight hours per day for five consecutive days.

The experiment protocol included baseline audiometry on day 0, rest periods for three days (days 1 to 3), exposure periods (only for experimental group), second audiometry (an hour after the last exposure to noise on day 8), rest period for three days (days 9 to 11), and a third audiometry (72 hours after the last exposure on day 8). Control group was treated similarly except for exposure to noise. The rabbits were exposed to noise in a transparent polycarbonated Plexiglas chamber with dimensions of 50×50×50 cm; the box size was calculated based on clearances needed for six rabbits, ventilated air volume, and reverberation environment (that SPL was independent on distances).

Noise was generated by a signal generator software developed by Pardisan Technology and Science Park, and delivered using Cool Edit Pro ver. 2.1 (Syntrillium Software Corporation). The generated noise was amplified by an amplifier (model ES-2000s, ES Audio Industrial Corporation), and was delivered to animals by a pair of loudspeakers (Micro Lab, model Subwoofer M-563, Probit Co.) mounted on the roof of the box. The SPL was systematically monitored in the chamber by a sound level meter (SLM type Precision, model CEL-490, Cassella-CEL Company) attached to an analyzer located at animal hearing zone. The mean±SD background noise in the animal house and lab was below 20±2 dB.

The animals were anesthetized by a mixture of 60% ketamine (40 mg/kg) and 40% xylazine (10 mg/kg) and examined otologically to exclude any infection or ear channel blockage by wax. Middle ear health was examined by tympanometry. Ldp recording was done in the left ear using DPOAE analyzer (DPOAE Model 4000 I/O, Homoth Co.). Ldp audiograms were measured using two pure tone stimuli: f1–f2 with f2/f1 ratio of 1.25. Intensity levels of the two tones, L1 and L2, were set at almost 75 and 65 dB SPL, respectively. Before Ldp recordings, signal levels were calibrated in ear canal by using an emission probe microphone.

Both Ldp and signal to noise ratio (SNR) were measured at 2f1–f2 and plotted against the geometric mean of f1 and f2. Measurements with a SNR of 6 dB or more were used for in analyses. The function of the OHCs was assessed by measurements of DPOAE levels (Ldp) on days 0, 8, and 11 of the study. DPOAE temporary and permanent level shifts (TLSdp and PLSdp), and its magnitude (pre-exposure level minus post-exposure level) were compared to assess the effect of noise on the function of the OHCs. The rabbits' body temperature was kept constant during the test for avoiding interference with Ldp measurement.

Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine the normality of the distribution of the continuous data. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare means of several measurements of Ldp and Lnf across time. One-way ANOVA was used to compare means of Ldp and Lnf at different frequencies. Tukey's HSD was used as the post hoc test. Paired-sample Student's t test was used to compare Ldp and its Lnf between the right and left ears. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

Results

Analysis of the pre-exposure and post-exposure Ldp revealed that it was not significantly different across times in the control rabbits (p=0.072) (Table 1). Lnf over a vast range of frequencies was not different across occasions (p=0.093). Ldp was not significantly different between the two ears (p=0.075).

Table 1: DPOAE levels (Ldp) and the corresponding noise floor levels (Lnf) at different times in the control group

Frequency

(Hz)

Mean±SD DPOAE levels (Ldp) (dB)

Mean±SD noise floor levels (Lnf) (dB)

Day 0

Day 8

Day 11

Day 0

Day 8

Day 11

588.00

4.98±0.09

5.27±0.07

5.13±0.09

–0.72±0.01

–0.16±0.06

–0.61±0.05

867.00

9.28±0.07

9.53±0.08

9.48±0.11

–1.41±0.04

1.03±0.04

–1.03±0.08

1133.00

13.43±0.09

13.21±0.10

13.71±0.14

–1.56±0.03

–1.96±0.06

–0.97±0.03

1677.00

18.74±0.12

18.48±0.14

18.51±0.11

–2.55±0.06

–1.02±0.10

–2.65±0.06

1967.00

23.23±0.11

22.98±0.08

22.99±0.15

–2.08±0.04

–2.77±0.8

–2.08±0.02

3098.50

27.31±0.07

27.57±0.11

27.07±0.10

–2.75±0.03

–3.05±0.04

–2.98±0.07

3956.00

31.22±0.13

31.48±0.09

31.06±0.13

–3.16±0.06

–2.01±0.06

–3.75±0.09

5888.50

36.55±0.18

36.31±0.12

36.82±0.09

–4.27±0.09

–3.89±0.10

–3.89±0.07

8166.50

34.78±0.16

34.53±0.06

34.96±0.12

–4.43±0.11

–3.12±0.07

–4.34±0.10

9855.00

33.18±0.13

33.43±0.09

33.34±0.08

–4.12±0.08

–5.25±0.11

–5.07±0.07

Pre-exposure DPOAE level (Ldp) in the experimental (noise-exposed) rabbits was not different from that recorded in the control rabbits (p=0.081) (Table 2). Noise-induced Ldp was decreased up to 18.93 dB on day 8, and 20.65 dB on day 11, at 5888.50 Hz. The least diminished Ldp was 0.66 dB on day 8, and 2.02 dB on day 11, at 588.00 Hz. Differences of Ldp over frequency range were statistically significant across time in the experimental (noise-exposed) rabbits (p=0.003). There were significant differences in Ldp recorded at any frequency among days 0, 8, and 11 (p=0.009). It seems that this difference was mainly attributed to 5888.50 Hz (p<0.002). Ldp was not significantly different between right and left ears in noise-exposed rabbits (p=0.082).

Table 2: DPOAE levels (Ldp) and the corresponding noise floor levels (Lnf) at different times in the experimental (noise-exposed) group

Frequency

(Hz)

Mean±SD DPOAE levels (Ldp) (dB)

Mean±SD noise floor levels (Lnf) (dB)

Day 0

Day 8

Day 11

Day 0

Day 8

Day 11

588.00

5.39±0.03

0.66±0.02

2.02±0.04

–6.02±0.02

–5.46±0.03

–6.43±0.02

867.00

9.07±0.06

3.03±0.05

3.57±0.03

–6.84±0.05

–6.97±0.05

–6.06±0.04

1133.00

13.02±0.02

5.48±0.04

6.97±0.04

–6.95±0.06

–7.57±0.02

–6.03±0.02

1677.00

18.97±0.03

11.01±0.07

12.05±0.06

–6.86±0.02

–8.25±0.03

–7.63±0.03

1967.00

23.93±0.05

12.97±0.03

15.11±0.02

–8.57±0.05

–7.83±0.05

–8.71±0.05

3098.50

27.38±0.08

15.15±0.06

16.09±0.05

–8.32±0.03

–9.38±0.06

–8.56±0.06

3956.00

31.42±0.04

18.08±0.03

18.96±0.08

–9.87±0.02

–10.61±0.05

–9.54±0.05

5888.50

36.92±0.07

18.93±0.05

20.65±0.05

–10.76±0.07

–9.03±0.03

–10.76±0.03

8166.50

34.19±0.09

16.75±0.07

18.85±0.07

–11.92±0.08

–10.11±0.07

–10.22±0.04

9855.00

33.61±0.10

17.23±0.09

18.88±0.04

–12.13±0.03

–11.32±0.06

–12.44±0.08


Table 3: Comparison of TLSdp and PLSdp between the noise-exposed and control groups. Numbers are expressed as mean±SD.

Frequency

(Hz)

Control group

Noise-exposed group

TLSdp* (dB)

PLSdp (dB)

TLSdp (dB)

PLSdp (dB)

588.00

0.29±0.02

0.15±0.01

4.73±0.03

3.37±0.05

867.00

0.25±0.04

0.20±0.03

6.04±0.02

5.50±0.03

1133.00

0.22±0.06

0.28±0.05

7.54±0.06

6.05±0.02

1677.00

0.26±0.02

0.23±0.02

7.96±0.03

6.92±0.06

1967.00

0.25±0.04

0.24±0.04

10.96±0.04

8.82±0.02

3098.50

0.26±0.01

0.24±0.05

12.23±0.07

11.29±0.04

3956.00

0.26±0.03

0.16±0.02

13.34±0.02

12.46±0.05

5888.50

0.24±0.04

0.27±0.01

17.99±0.06

16.27±0.02

8166.50

0.25±0.06

0.18±0.05

17.44±0.03

15.34±0.07

9855.00

0.25±0.03

0.16±0.03

16.38±0.06

14.73±0.08

 

Both TLSdp and PLSdp were significantly different between the two studied groups (p=0.003, p=0.021, respectively) (Table 3). TLSdp had a mild decreasing trend in noise-exposed rabbits compared to the control rabbits; the trend in PLSdp was sharper than that for TLSdp. Both TLSdp and PLSdp changed significantly (p=0.016) over frequency range in noise-exposed rabbits. Differences were mostly due to the frequency of 5888.50 Hz. The highest and lowest TLSdp and PLSdp values were recorded at 5888.50 Hz and 588 Hz, respectively.

Discussion

Exposure to noise caused a drop in DPOAE levels (Ldp) up to 20.65 dB on day 8 and 18.93 dB on day 11 at 5888.50 Hz. Consistently, most studies showed that prolonged and repeated exposure of awake animals to continuous noise led to a significant decrease in Ldp in a wide range of frequencies as decrease in the function of the cochlear OHCs depends on exposure duration, and frequency and intensity of the noise.7-13 We observed different results in different frequencies that might be attributed to the use of a broadband noise in our study.

TLSdp and PLSdp were significantly decreased up to 17.99 dB and 16.27 dB, respectively in animals exposed to noise. Brief exposure to extremely high-intensity sounds may cause PLSdp, but it is more commonly caused by prolonged repetitive or continuous exposure to lower levels of hazardous noise.7,8 Susceptibility to NIHL is highly variable; while some individuals are able to tolerate high noise levels for long periods, others who are subjected to the same environment rapidly lose hearing.7,8,11 Risk of PLSdp is related to the duration and intensity of the exposure as well as to genetic susceptibility to noise trauma.9,11 Inner ear is believed to be partially protected from the effects of continuous noise by the acoustic reflex which is triggered when the ear is subjected to noise louder than 90 dB that causes the middle ear muscles (the stapedius and tensor tympani) to contract and thereby stiffen the conductive system, making it more resistant to sound entry.4,13 Because this protective reflex is neural, it is delayed for a period ranging from 25–150 ms, depending on the noise intensity.10,12 Reasons for reduced Ldp include misalignment of hair bundles on adjacent hair cells, non-linearity in stiffness of stereocilia, and damage of the tectorial membrane.1-5 Most studies found that the noise exposure causes permanent loss of hair cell stereocilia with apparent fracture of the rootlet structures and destruction of the sensory cells, which are replaced by nonfunctioning scar tissue.2,5 NIHL results from trauma to the sensory epithelium of the cochlea.3,7,9 In TLS, several potentially reversible effects such as regional decrease in stiffness of stereocilia secondary to contraction of rootlet structures, which are anchored to the cuticular plate of hair cells, intracellular changes within the hair cells including metabolic exhaustion and microvascular changes, edema of the auditory nerve endings, and degeneration of synapses within the cochlear nucleus, can be occurred.1,3-5 While in PLS, the changes become irreversible and include breaks in the rootlet structures, disruption of the cochlear duct and organ of Corti causing mixing of endolymph and perilymph, loss of hair cells, and degeneration of cochlear nerve fibers.2,3,5

An important cause of cochlear OHCs' dysfunction (presented as decreased Ldp) and damage to organ of Corti is based on oxidative stress mechanism.14 Metabolic damage or exhaustion is believed to occur when toxic waste products, the so-called free radicals including reactive oxygen species or reactive nitrogen species, are formed after cochlear cells are stressed by reductions in cochlear blood flow, excessive and toxic levels of neurotransmitters like glutamate, altered intracellular calcium balance, and other stress-related changes that are induced by noise.15,16 These free radicals injure a wide variety of critical structures in the cochlea, causing cell damage and cell death.17,18 Noise exposure affects several structural elements in hair cells, including the cell membrane and intracellular biochemical pathways.19 These changes may evoke the formation of free radicals, resulting in sensorineural hearing loss.20 Free radicals may increase dramatically within a few minutes or hours after exposure to an intense noise.14,18 Noise-induced cochlear free radicals endanger hair cells intrinsic antioxidant system—the glutathione system, which is a powerful natural antioxidant system in the cochlear hair cells.19 Depletion of glutathione contents in the organ of Corti due to exposure to noise can cause more susceptibility to hearing loss.17,20

DPOAEs levels (Ldp) were not significantly different between right and left ears in animals exposed to noise. Creation of reverberation field in the exposure chamber seems to be the most important reason. Some studies reported similar results,9,10,12 but others did not.21-23 Sato, et al, showed that an efferent influence may also help to explain the difference some researchers observed between the Ldp in the left and right ears.21 Another study indicated that tone-evoked Ldp are larger in the left ear.22 van den Brink reported pitch differences between left and right ears when they are exposed to the same frequency stimulus.23

We studied albino rabbits; however, interspecies differences should be appreciated in interpreting results. There are clear interspecies differences in the dependence of Ldp on frequency and that Ldp tends to be largest in the regions of best hearing sensitivity in each species.24 It has been shown that systematic variations in DPOAEs parameters such as L1 and L2, f1 and f2 generally produce qualitatively similar changes in emission levels in humans, monkeys, cats, rabbits, and rodents.13 These similarities occur despite the quantitative differences, particularly in the f2/f1 ratio that elicits the largest DPOAEs, which is greater in rabbits and rodents (1.25) than in humans (1.22).13

Sex differences seem to play a key role in the measurement of Ldp—only male rabbits were used in the present study. Some reported Ldp are larger in female humans and rhesus monkey than in males.25,26 Larger Ldp may be correlated to a better hearing threshold for females of the same species.25,26 Some researchers believe that this difference is partly attributed to different hormonal exposure,25,26 while others believe that it can be attributed to a sex difference in the OHC electromotility and/or in the mechanism(s) responsible for stereociliary bundle motility.25,26 Both of these reasons can be the result of gender differences in membrane lipid profiles that would alter lipid-protein interactions.25,26 Another possibility is the shorter length of female cochleae,21 or gender differences in the size of the middle ear.26 The observed Ldp would have been larger if the studied animals were female rabbits.26

In conclusion, DPOAEs might be used as a screening and diagnostic test for early detection of NIHL in people with normal audiograms. OHCs were affected early in NIHL, and DPOAEs can detect subtle changes in OHCs function as temporary or permanent level shifts.

 

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Richard D. Kopke, from the Department of Defense Spatial Orientation Center, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, California, USA, for his helpful comments. This study has been conducted in Tarbiat Modares University.

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

 

References

  1. Dalebout S. The praeger guide to hearing and hearing loss: assessment, treatment, and prevention. 1st ed. Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc, Westport, New England, USA, 2009.
  2. Mulroy MJ, Henry WR, McNeil PL. Noise-induced transient microlesions in the cell membranes of auditory hair cells. Hear Res 1998;115:93-100.
  3. Lalwani AK. Current diagnosis & treatment in otolaryngology-head & neck surgery. A LANGE medical book. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Co, Inc, New York, USA, 2008.
  4. Sataloff RT, Sataloff J. Occupational Hearing Loss. 3rd ed. Taylor & Francis Publishers. CRC Press, New York, USA, 2006.
  5. Maltby M. Occupational Audiometry: Monitoring and protecting hearing at work. 1st ed. Elsevier Ltd, London, England, 2005.
  6. Clark WW, Bohne BA. Effects of noise on hearing. JAMA 1999;281:1658-9.
  7. Emmerich E, Richter F, Reinhold U, et al. Effects of industrial noise exposure on distortion product Otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and hair cell loss of the cochlea-long term experiments in awake guinea pigs. Hear Res 2000;148:9-17.
  8. Frankel R, Freeman S, Sohmer H. Use of ABR and OAEs in detection of noise induced hearing loss. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2003;14:95-118.
  9. Engdahl BO, Kemp DT. The effects of noise exposure on details of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:1573-87.
  10. Eddins AC, Zuskov M, Salvi RJ. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during prolonged noise exposure. Hear Res 1999;127:119-28.
  11. Hamernik RP, Ahroon WA, Jock BM, Bennett JA. Noise-induced threshold shift dynamics measured with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and auditory evoked potentials in chinchillas with inner hair cell deficient cochleas. Hear Res 1998;118,73-82.
  12. Nagy AL, Toth F, Vajtai R, et al. Effects of noise on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Int Tinnitus J 2002;8:94-6.
  13. Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;91:1587-607.
  14. Kopke RD, Allen KA, Henderson D, et al. A radical demise: toxins and trauma share common pathways in hair cell death. In: Henderson D, Salvi R, Quaranta A, McFadden S, Buckard R, eds. Ototoxicity: Basic Sciences and Clinical Applications. 1st ed. Ann Acad Sci. New York, USA, 1999:884.
  15. Huang T, Cheng AG., Stupak H, et al. Oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of cochlear sensory cells: otoprotective strategies. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2000;18:259-70.
  16. Kaygusuz I, Ozturk A, Ustundag B, Yalcin S. Role of free oxygen radicals in noise-related hearing impairment. Hear Res 2001;162:43-7.
  17. Ohlemiller KK, wright JS, Dugan LL. Early elevation of cochlear reactive oxygen species following noise exposure. Audiol Neurootol 1999;4:229-36.
  18. Jacono AA, Hu B, Kopke RD, et al. Changes in cochlear antioxidant enzyme activity after sound conditioning and noise exposure in the chinchilla. Hear Res 1998;117:31-8.
  19. Fechter LD. Oxidative stress: a potential basis for potentiation of noise-induced hearing loss. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2005;19:543-6.
  20. Yamane H, Nakai Y, Takayama M, et al.The emergence of free radicals after acoustic trauma and strial blood flow. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1995;519:87-92.
  21. Sato H, Sando I, Takahashi H. Sexual dimorphism and development of the human cochlea: Computer 3-D measurement. Acta Otolaryngol 1991;111:1037-40.
  22. Sininger Y, Cone-Wesson B. Asymmetric cochlear processing mimics hemispheric specialization. Science 2004;305:1581.
  23. Van den Brink G. Experiments in binaural diplacusis and tonal perception. In: Plomp R, Smoorenburg GF, eds. Frequency Analysis and Periodicitiy Detection in Hearing. 1st eds. Leiden: Sijthoff AW, 1970:362-74.
  24. Brown AM. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils. Hear Res 1987;31:25-38.
  25. Bilger R, Matthies ML, Hammel DR, Demorest ME. Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1990;33:418-32.
  26. McFadden D. A masculinizing effect on the auditory systems of human females having male co-twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:11900-4.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

  • Noise-induced hearing loss is one of the most common occupational illnesses.
  • Repeated or prolonged exposure to intense noise gradually damages the cochlear hair cells of the inner ear, resulting in a permanent threshold shift across multiple frequencies.
  • DPOAEs are an attractive tool for obtaining information about small temporary or permanent threshold shifts, even when the pure tone audiogram is normal.

Cite this article as: Moussavi-Najarkola SA, Khavanin A, Mirzaei R, et al. Temporary and permanent level shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions following noise exposure in an animal model. The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2012;3:145-52.




 pISSN: 2008-6520
 eISSN: 2008-6814

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License